top of page

Dennis's Share: Philosopher Ayn Rand

  • Feb 2
  • 2 min read

Updated: Feb 4

From Dennis: I joined "Think and think again" to escape the daily newsflow with its 98% "noise to signal" ratio and identify interesting and enriching content. I am personally always trying to find material that is being read (and therefore relevant) since long time. Think Marcus Aurelius :-) 

In this context, I’d like to suggest an author who rarely leaves people indifferent: Ayn Rand.

Her novels (most notably Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead) have fascinated me for a long time. Rand has been read for decades, passionately admired and equally passionately opposed. That polarisation alone makes her worth engaging with. She does not merely offer opinions; she presents a fully articulated philosophy.

Rand attempts something ambitious: to think through fundamental ethical values (individualism, responsibility, achievement, freedom) radically and without compromise. Her theses are intentionally extreme and worked through relentlessly in her fiction. One does not have to agree with her to gain value from reading her. In fact, the friction is precisely what forces clarity about one’s own beliefs.

Personally, engaging with her ideas has helped me step back from daily political fluctuations and the constant news cycle, and instead evaluate events through more fundamental principles. Since I read these, every time someone "demands" something I cannot help myself, but to think "on what grounds"? :-)

For that reason alone, I believe she is worth the time investment. Anyone interested in challenging, provocative thought experiments will find ample material for reflection here.


💬 A quick note: replies can be easy to miss here, so feel free to add a new comment rather than replying directly. This isn’t a fast-fire space, it’s intentionally slower, and shaped for thoughtful engagement with the ideas themselves, rather than back-and-forth responses.

 
 
 

14 Comments


Nile Seguin
Feb 07

I read The Fountainhead a long time ago and it took me some time to understand what it was about it that appealed to me so much. Politically I couldn’t disagree with Rand more so I was confused until I realized what was so appealing was the unshakeable confidence of its lead character. He never doubted anything for a second and that is something that like many people I wanted to have for myself. But yeah, the philosophy can be very appealing because it offers a black-and-white perspective in a world of greys. But the fact that the author herself ended up collecting social benefits to me, is the best illustration that it’s not be something that you can use…

Like
Nile Seguin
Feb 08
Replying to

Sure it’sa fun read but is it applicable to life? I think the fact we’re also discussing her eventually having taken social assistance when her income declined says a lot to answer this. If her philosophy were real and she was Howard Roark she would have gotten a job and paid her way regardless of what government program she had paid into. And to be clear I think it’s fine she collected government assistance because I believe in programs like that

Like

Jeanne
Feb 06

@Dennis E to answer your question: What really got to me is the idea that individualism and personal ambition should be pursued without interference. That idea alone stirred up a surprisingly complex mix of feelings for me, which I’ll try and exaplin here - sorry if it’s long! I was educated in a Catholic school, and even though I am not a religious person, I think that instilled a very deep, almost instinctive sense of altruism, of doing the right thing, even when it’s inconvenient.


The second thing is more lived than theoretical. I already feel that we are too individualistic as a society, and I see the repercussions of that every day. I wouldn’t want to live in a world…


Like
Dennis E
Dennis E
Feb 11
Replying to

A great perspective and example. And it applies also to other situations that are not so extraordinary as giving birth and caring for a toddler. I am thinking of relationships. A partner is not responsible for the other partners happiness. Everyone needs to finds his happiness and can, based on this, contribute to the others happiness, but not the other way around… I think of it as virtuous cycles instead of vicious. A system that is enabling and focussing on energy and happiness and contribution versus need and obligations…

Like

Thank you for sharing Ayn, Dennis. Perfect Think Again material!! I gobbled up all Rand's books about a decade ago. I read them without any preconceptions of her work - before reading them I didn't know that her novels were political - and I feel lucky that I got to approach her from a position of neutrality. It was shortly after finishing university where I did an Arts degree majoring in International Relations, which had a heavily left-leaning undercurrent. It was therefore very interesting to me to hear Ayn's capitalist views expounded through her fiction writing. As an atheist, I found her ideas about reason and objectivism compelling. I also was quite inspired by the fact that a woman wa…

Like
Jeanne
Feb 04
Replying to
Like

Jeanne
Feb 02

Thank you Dennis for bringing this into TTA! I’ve done a little research on the book you mention and found this (link below). It summarises Atlas Shrugged for those who want to know a little more. This article alone had me feeling angry and outraged haha! And that’s a good thing when we’re committed to Thinking and Thinking Again! But also very curious to read more to make sure there isn't anything I am missing.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/160/Atlas_Shrugged_by_Ayn_Rand

Edited
Like
Dennis E
Dennis E
Feb 06
Replying to

I am so interested how your reading of the summary article makes you "angry and outraged". What are your trigger points in there?

Like

© 2026 Think & Think Again

bottom of page